From a9a31b1de5776a3b08a82101a4fa711294f0dd1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:28:30 +0100 Subject: Imported Upstream version 0.9.6+really0.9.3 --- tests/test-stdbool.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) (limited to 'tests/test-stdbool.c') diff --git a/tests/test-stdbool.c b/tests/test-stdbool.c index 1da25d07..fcb534de 100644 --- a/tests/test-stdbool.c +++ b/tests/test-stdbool.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Test of substitute. - Copyright (C) 2002-2007, 2009-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + Copyright (C) 2002-2007, 2009-2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -16,17 +16,6 @@ /* Written by Bruno Haible , 2007. */ -/* We want this test to succeed even when using gcc's -Werror; but to - do that requires a pragma that didn't exist before 4.3.0. */ -#ifndef __GNUC__ -# define ADDRESS_CHECK_OKAY -#elif __GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 3) -/* No way to silence -Waddress. */ -#else -# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waddress" -# define ADDRESS_CHECK_OKAY -#endif - #include #include @@ -50,36 +39,49 @@ "error: __bool_true_false_are_defined is not defined" #endif -/* Several tests cannot be guaranteed with gnulib's , at - least, not for all compilers and compiler options. */ -#if HAVE_STDBOOL_H || 3 <= __GNUC__ +#if 0 /* Cannot be guaranteed with gnulib's . */ struct s { _Bool s: 1; _Bool t; } s; #endif char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1]; char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1]; char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1]; -#if HAVE_STDBOOL_H || 3 <= __GNUC__ /* See above. */ +#if 0 /* Cannot be guaranteed with gnulib's , at least, +not for all compilers. */ char d[(bool) 0.5 == true ? 1 : -1]; -# ifdef ADDRESS_CHECK_OKAY /* Avoid gcc warning. */ -/* C99 may plausibly be interpreted as not requiring support for a cast from - a variable's address to bool in a static initializer. So treat it like a - GCC extension. */ -# ifdef __GNUC__ bool e = &s; -# endif -# endif char f[(_Bool) 0.0 == false ? 1 : -1]; #endif char g[true]; char h[sizeof (_Bool)]; -#if HAVE_STDBOOL_H || 3 <= __GNUC__ /* See above. */ +#if 0 /* See above. */ char i[sizeof s.t]; #endif enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 }; _Bool n[m]; char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1]; char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1]; +#if 0 /* Cannot be guaranteed with gnulib's . */ +#if defined __xlc__ || defined __GNUC__ + /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0 + reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see + http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html + This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to + reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is + not one of the forms that C requires support for. + However, doing the test right would require a run-time + test, and that would make cross-compilation harder. + Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds + support for this kind of constant expression. In the + meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since + our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. We also test + this with GCC, where it should work, to detect more + quickly whether someone messes up the test in the + future. */ + char digs[] = "0123456789"; + int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1); +#endif +#endif /* Catch a bug in an HP-UX C compiler. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html @@ -90,29 +92,5 @@ _Bool *pq = &q; int main () { - int error = 0; - -#if HAVE_STDBOOL_H || 3 <= __GNUC__ /* See above. */ -# ifdef ADDRESS_CHECK_OKAY /* Avoid gcc warning. */ - /* A cast from a variable's address to bool is valid in expressions. */ - { - bool e1 = &s; - if (!e1) - error = 1; - } -# endif -#endif - - /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0 - reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html - This is a runtime test, since a corresponding compile-time - test would rely on initializer extensions. */ - { - char digs[] = "0123456789"; - if (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] != &digs[4]) - error = 1; - } - - return error; + return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3