diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/gt68xx/gt68xx.TODO')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/gt68xx/gt68xx.TODO | 105 |
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/gt68xx/gt68xx.TODO b/doc/gt68xx/gt68xx.TODO new file mode 100644 index 0000000..74aeb17 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/gt68xx/gt68xx.TODO @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +gt68xx.TODO -*-text-*- + +General: +-------- + +- some sort of fixed lookup-table may be necessary to compensate for the + non-linear CCD/CIS behaviour. A gamma value is not good enough. Or maybe line + calibration can be used for that? +- Some Plustek scanners are advertised with e.g. 1200x2400 but the maximum + vertical resolution seems to be limited to the horizontal one. Check if + that's really the case. +- Keep a log of all gain/offset combinations already tested and break if + one is repeated to avoid endless loops. +- Print commands that are send to the scanner in clear text. +- Try to implement non-blocking USB bulk reads, check libusb CVS. + +CCD: +---- + +Mustek BearPaw 2400 TA Plus: +- some lines at the beginning of each image have wrong colors (linedistance?) + This seems to happen with other scanners, too. +- 600 dpi no backtrack, 1200, 2400 dpi backtrack (gray), check with windows for + color +- 600 dpi 12 bit seems to work in pixel mode only (but long lines are too big!) + +Mustek BearPaw 1200 TA: +- similar color problem as 2400 TA Plus, doesn't always happen? + +Mustek BearPaw 2448 TA Plus: +- all modes are slow (massive backtracking). If connected to a USB2 port, the + backtracking ich much less despite this scanner can't do USB2. Strange. +- Sometimes there is a USB protocol error when cancelling the scan? +- top borders move with resolution (happened in the early days with 2400 TA!) +- gray scans have different brightness +- scan motor is bumpy and freezes sometimes, looks like accelaration is too big + (firmware problem?) +- vertical stripes +- TA settings are wrong +- no backtrack >= 600 dpi (also gray!) +- don't move before and after scan +- check jpeg output, maybe this can be used for faster scans + +Plustek 1248U: +- Linedistance seems to have problems in the first few and the last lines. +- Gain and offset values are quite high. Optimum values are not reached. Problem + with coarse calib? Better algorithm needed. +- Images in color mode sometimes look too redish (result of above problem). +- quite slow when full width is selected. Lots of backtracking. +- Check if pixel mode is possible. +- Check again 600x1200 dpi. + +Plustek U16B: +- 600 dpi 16 bit is limited to about half the size of the scan area because + only pixel mode works and 16k is the maximum buffer size. +- After scanning, a run of sane-find-scanner leads to a protocol error and + scanning does no longer work. + +Genius ColorPage Vivid 1200XE +- 16 bit per color is advertized but this mode doesn't seem to work + (only 12 bit)? +- 1200x1200 and 1200x2400 dpi doesn't seem to work despite being advertized +- Y-positioning varies slightly with resolution (some mm) + +CIS: +---- + +- It may be necessary to do an additional exposure calibration before the + offset/gain calibration to compensate for different intensities of the + colored leds. Especially for the Mustek 2400 CU Plus. +- Changing exposure doesn't seem to have any effect during calibration + sometimes while it has an effect on the final image? + +Mustek BearPaw 1200 CU +- ok + +Mustek BearPaw 1200 CU Plus (0x021b) +- ok, but similar exposure problems as 2400 CU Plus + +Mustek BearPaw 2400 CU Plus +- ok, but exposure setting may need to be done automatically if the intensity + of the colors varies for different scanners. +- calibration/exposure has sometimes sharp jumps in intensity. Reason is + unknown. + +Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB +- still slight vert. stripes +- why is line distance setup necessary? +- line distance varies with resolution (0,5,5 at 300 dpi, 0, 6, 7 with 150 dpi) +- exposure doesn't seem to have any effect + +Mustek ScanExpress 1248 UB +ok + +Plustek OpticSlim 2400 +- only upto 1200 dpi vertical works +- only 8 and 12 bit work, 16 doesn't (check Windows) +- exposure is extremely high and seems to have similar problems as with other + CIS scanners (reaches limit also) + +Mustek ScanExpress 2400 USB +- make it work (nobody seems to have this device) + +Visioneer OneTouch 7300 +- 16 bit doesn't seem to work despite beeing advertized |